2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 198 kg more than 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML. (350 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | E-150 | ML |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 95 L |