2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2006 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2006 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1213 kg more than 2006 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG TF. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 2006 MG TF | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | E-150 | TF |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
