2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2007 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2007 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Land Rover LR3 (300 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2007 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2007 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | E-150 | LR3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 86 L |