2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2008 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 225 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1306 kg more than 2008 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2008 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2008 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Van | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 6030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 132 L |