2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma
To start off, 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 994 kg more than 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma. (216 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2008 Mitsubishi Carisma | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | E-150 | Carisma |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 216 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1389 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |