2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2010 Land Rover Freelander. (158 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2010 Land Rover Freelander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 325 kg more than 2005 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Freelander (401 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2010 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2010 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | E-150 | Freelander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 401 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 96 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 2708 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |