2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2010 Maybach 62
To start off, 2010 Maybach 62 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Maybach 62 (631 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 406 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Maybach 62 weights approximately 493 kg more than 2005 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Maybach 62 (999 Nm) has 626 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2010 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2010 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Ford | Maybach |
Model | E-150 | 62 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 631 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 999 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 2876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 6165 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1981 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1575 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3828 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 110 L |