2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2011 Ford E-350
To start off, 2011 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-350 weights approximately 158 kg more than 2005 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-350 (474 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2011 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 474 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 2541 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 2126 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 125 L |