2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | E-150 | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 132 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |
