2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2012 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2012 Nissan Armada is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Armada (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1 kg more than 2012 Nissan Armada.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Armada (521 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2012 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-150 | Armada |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 521 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 2382 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5276 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2014 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3129 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 106 L |