2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 389 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS-V.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | E-150 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 548 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 747 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.1 |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1994 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |