2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Impala (296 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 725 kg more than 2013 Chevrolet Impala.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Impala. (355 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-150 | 2013 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | E-150 | Impala |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 355 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1658 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1851 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |