2005 Ford E-150 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 673 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XK.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (515 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-150. (373 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-150 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | E-150 | XK |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 380 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2383 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4794 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2032 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1322 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2752 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
