2005 Ford E-250 vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1009 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | E-250 | XK |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 63 L |