2005 Ford E-250 vs. 1963 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (72 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1134 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellel. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 1963 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | Ford | Isuzu |
Model | E-250 | Bellel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 112 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 40 L |