2005 Ford E-250 vs. 1964 Rover P5
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rover P5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rover P5 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1964 Rover P5. (119 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1964 Rover P5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 584 kg more than 1964 Rover P5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Rover P5. (219 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Rover P5.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 1964 Rover P5 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | E-250 | P5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1964 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 219 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 77.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 105 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 52 L |