2005 Ford E-250 vs. 1969 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (20 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1864 kg more than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 351 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Suzuki Fronte. (37 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-250 | 1969 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | E-250 | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 20 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 1970 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 66 L |
