2005 Ford E-250 vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (79 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1172 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho. (119 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 1980 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
Model | E-250 | Rancho |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 119 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 76.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 78 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1132 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |