2005 Ford E-250 vs. 1982 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Pontiac Firebird. (168 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1982 Pontiac Firebird.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Pontiac Firebird. (338 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Pontiac Firebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-250 | 1982 Pontiac Firebird | |
| Make | Ford | Pontiac |
| Model | E-250 | Firebird |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 60 L |
