2005 Ford E-250 vs. 1983 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (34 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1983 Renault Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1584 kg more than 1983 Renault Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Renault Rodeo. (75 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Renault Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-250 | 1983 Renault Rodeo | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | E-250 | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 75 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 34 L |
