2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2001 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MCC Smart would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2001 MCC Smart. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2001 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1584 kg more than 2001 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MCC Smart. (89 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 2001 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | E-250 | Smart |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 89 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 63.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 63 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 2600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 1820 mm |