2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2002 TVR T 350
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 TVR T 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 TVR T 350 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 TVR T 350 (345 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1074 kg more than 2002 TVR T 350.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 TVR T 350 (391 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2002 TVR T 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 2002 TVR T 350 | |
Make | Ford | TVR |
Model | E-250 | T 350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 391 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 65 L |