2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 211 kg more than 2005 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford E-250 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
Make Ford Land Rover
Model E-250 Range Rover
Year Released 2005 2003
Body Type Van SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4605 cc 4396 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 225 HP 282 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5400 RPM
Torque 388 Nm 440 Nm
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 82.7 mm
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2304 kg 2515 kg
Vehicle Length 5390 mm 4960 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 2200 mm
Vehicle Height 2120 mm 1870 mm
Wheelbase Size 3510 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 14.7 L/100km 18.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 132 L 100 L