2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2006 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2006 GMC Yukon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 2006 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Ford | GMC |
Model | E-250 | Yukon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 509 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 98 L |