2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,064 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 839 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1024 kg more than 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR (1,060 Nm) has 672 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-250 | 2008 Koenigsegg CCXR | |
| Make | Ford | Koenigsegg |
| Model | E-250 | CCXR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 1064 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 1060 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 22 L/100km |
