2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2011 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac STS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac STS (302 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac STS should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 502 kg more than 2011 Cadillac STS.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Cadillac STS. (368 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 2011 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Ford | Cadillac |
Model | E-250 | STS |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 368 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1802 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2957 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 64 L |