2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2012 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2012 Ford Falcon is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 600 kg more than 2012 Ford Falcon.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Falcon (533 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford E-250 | 2012 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-250 | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4605 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 362 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 533 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2838 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |