2005 Ford E-250 vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 614 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (489 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford E-250 | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
| Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
| Model | E-250 | Vantage |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Van | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7300 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 489 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 91 mm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2304 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4382 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2022 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |
