2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 293 kg more than 1951 Humber Pullman. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Ford | Humber |
Model | Econoline | Pullman |
Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3330 mm |