2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1963 Rover 2000

To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1113 kg more than 1963 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.

Compare all specifications: