2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1977 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1515 kg more than 1977 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2005 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 1977 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econoline | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2310 mm |