2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep. (102 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 805 kg more than 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep. (197 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 1977 Mitsubishi Jeep | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econoline | Jeep |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2650 mm |