2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1505 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Econoline | Tercel |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2510 mm |