2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1986 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1986 Ford Aerostar. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 915 kg more than 1986 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Econoline | 1986 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Econoline | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Van | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3030 mm |
