2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1992 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJR (333 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 501 kg more than 1992 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJR (495 Nm @ 3650 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1992 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Econoline | 1992 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Econoline | XJR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 333 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3650 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1824 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2600 mm |
