2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1996 Mazda Midge

To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1353 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2005 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.

Compare all specifications: