2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (550 HP) has 353 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 (637 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Econoline | 1996 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Econoline | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Van | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 550 HP |
| Torque | 338 Nm | 637 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2720 mm |
