2005 Ford Econoline vs. 2001 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Saab 03-Sep. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Saab 03-Sep would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Saab 03-Sep (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Because 2005 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Saab 03-Sep, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Saab 03-Sep (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2001 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 2001 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Econoline | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2610 mm |