2005 Ford Econoline vs. 2004 Holden UTE
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Holden UTE would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 825 kg more than 2004 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Holden UTE. (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 2004 Holden UTE | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Econoline | UTE |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Van | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2950 mm |