2005 Ford Econoline vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Econoline would be higher.
Because 2005 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Econoline | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1840 mm |