2005 Ford Econoline vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Econoline | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |