2005 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Audi Q5
To start off, 2012 Audi Q5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q5 (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 470 kg more than 2012 Audi Q5.
Because 2012 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi Q5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Audi Q5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 2012 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Econoline | Q5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2807 mm |