2005 Ford Econoline vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 404 kg more than 2012 Volvo XC60.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Econoline | XC60 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2748 mm |