2005 Ford Econovan vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Ford Econovan is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,788 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econovan weights approximately 795 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Econovan (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Econovan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Econovan | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Econovan | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1788 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2060 mm |
