2005 Ford Econovan vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econovan. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Econovan | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Econovan | Colorado |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Van | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1788 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
