2005 Ford Escape vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2005 Ford Escape is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Escape weights approximately 352 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2005 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Escape | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Ford | Studebaker |
| Model | Escape | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2999 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1652 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2980 mm |
