2005 Ford Escape vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2005 Ford Escape is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2005 Ford Escape. (193 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Escape. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 903 kg more than 2005 Ford Escape. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Escape, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Escape | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | Escape | Continental |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3210 mm |