2005 Ford Escape vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Escape would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Escape weights approximately 442 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Escape (262 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Escape | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Escape | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2999 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 262 Nm | 127 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 79.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |