2005 Ford Escape vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Escape would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Ford Escape. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Escape.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Escape. (168 Nm). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Escape.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Escape | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Escape | Matrix |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 173 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.6 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.5 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 50 L |