2005 Ford Escape vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford Escape. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford Escape would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Escape weights approximately 138 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Escape (206 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Escape | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Escape | Countryman |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 155 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1478 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 47 L |